ORA-600 ktubko_1 恢复

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:ORA-600 ktubko_1 恢复

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

oracle 12.2的rac库,pdb在open成功之后,没过多久会自动crash掉,主要报错ORA-600 ktubko_1

2022-10-08T16:00:17.874444+08:00
XFF(5):Endian type of dictionary set to little
2022-10-08T16:00:18.602483+08:00
XFF(5):[218515] Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 26.
XFF(5):Undo initialization finished serial:0 start:73483625 end:73484200 diff:575 ms (0.6 seconds)
XFF(5):Database Characterset for XFF is ZHS16GBK
2022-10-08T16:00:19.340271+08:00
Buffer Cache Full DB Caching mode changing from FULL CACHING ENABLED to FULL CACHING DISABLED 
Full DB Caching disabled: DEFAULT_CACHE_SIZE should be at least 1394670 MBs bigger than current size. 
2022-10-08T16:00:21.308122+08:00
XFF(5):Opening pdb with no Resource Manager plan active
2022-10-08T16:00:22.655433+08:00
Pluggable database XFF opened read write
Completed:  ALTER PLUGGABLE DATABASE ALL OPEN
2022-10-08T16:00:36.419719+08:00
XFF(5):Setting Resource Manager plan SCHEDULER[0x4AC8]:DEFAULT_MAINTENANCE_PLAN via scheduler window
XFF(5):Setting Resource Manager plan DEFAULT_MAINTENANCE_PLAN via parameter
2022-10-08T16:00:57.054295+08:00
XFF(5):minact-scn: got error during useg scan e:1555 usn:57
XFF(5):minact-scn: useg scan erroring out with error e:1555
2022-10-08T16:01:41.527943+08:00
Errors in file /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_smon_218039.trc  (incident=737693) (PDBNAME=XFF):
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [ktubko_1], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
XFF(5):Incident details in: /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/incident/incdir_737693/orcl1_smon_218039_i737693.trc
XFF(5):Use ADRCI or Support Workbench to package the incident.
See Note 411.1 at My Oracle Support for error and packaging details.
2022-10-08T16:01:41.530481+08:00
XFF(5):*****************************************************************
XFF(5):An internal routine has requested a dump of selected redo.
XFF(5):This usually happens following a specific internal error, when
XFF(5):analysis of the redo logs will help Oracle Support with the
XFF(5):diagnosis.
XFF(5):It is recommended that you retain all the redo logs generated (by
XFF(5):all the instances) during the past 12 hours, in case additional
XFF(5):redo dumps are required to help with the diagnosis.
XFF(5):*****************************************************************
2022-10-08T16:01:42.611317+08:00
XFF(5):*****************************************************************
XFF(5):An internal routine has requested a dump of selected redo.
XFF(5):This usually happens following a specific internal error, when
XFF(5):analysis of the redo logs will help Oracle Support with the
XFF(5):diagnosis.
XFF(5):It is recommended that you retain all the redo logs generated (by
XFF(5):all the instances) during the past 12 hours, in case additional
XFF(5):redo dumps are required to help with the diagnosis.
XFF(5):*****************************************************************
XFF(5):ORACLE Instance orcl1 (pid = 44) - Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (12, 1) on object 50.
2022-10-08T16:01:42.611961+08:00
XFF(5):Errors in file /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_smon_218039.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [ktubko_1], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
2022-10-08T16:01:42.849438+08:00
Errors in file /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_smon_218039.trc  (incident=737694) (PDBNAME=XFF):
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [ktubko_1], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
XFF(5):Incident details in: /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/incident/incdir_737694/orcl1_smon_218039_i737694.trc
…………
2022-10-08T16:01:55.212368+08:00
Instance Critical Process (pid: 44, ospid: 218039, SMON) died unexpectedly
PMON (ospid: 217933): terminating the instance due to error 474
2022-10-08T16:01:55.379857+08:00
System state dump requested by (instance=1, osid=217933 (PMON)), summary=[abnormal instance termination].
System State dumped to trace file /u01/app/db/diag/rdbms/orcl/orcl1/trace/orcl1_diag_217966_20221008160155.trc
2022-10-08T16:01:56.417514+08:00
ORA-1092 : opitsk aborting process

因为有smon报的ORACLE Instance orcl1 (pid = 44) – Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (12, 1) on object xxx这种比较明显错误,基本上可以定位是undo问题.对undo异常事务进行处理,数据库顺利open,并且稳定不再crash,然后对异常对象进行处理(当然也可以逻辑迁移)
20221008220645


在oracle 12.2到18.14的rac环境的cdb库中,如果节点sga大小不一致,而且有一个节点sga大于128G,就可能出现该问题,敬请注意
20221008220914

Bug 32347014: ORA-600[4506], ORA-600[KTUBKO_1] OCCUR AND INSTANCE CRASHES

一键修改Oracle SCN工具升级(patch scn)

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:一键修改Oracle SCN工具升级(patch scn)

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

前段时间开发了基于内存修改的patch scn小程序(修改oracle scn小工具(patch scn)),用来修改oracle数据库scn,实现快速调整oracle scn的功能(特别是在一些恢复的时候很有用),最近对其功能进一步完善,扩展了通过修改oracle controlfile实现调整scn功能,简单测试如下
数据库当前scn情况

C:\Users\XFF>sqlplus / as sysdba

SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.4.0 Production on 星期四 10月 6 21:50:32 2022

Copyright (c) 1982, 2013, Oracle.  All rights reserved.


连接到:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

SQL> set num 16
SQL> select checkpoint_change# from v$database;

CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
------------------
      141743308712

SQL> shutdown immediate;
数据库已经关闭。
已经卸载数据库。
ORACLE 例程已经关闭。

通过工具一键修改oracle scn
20221006220814


启动库查看修改之后scn值

SQL> startup mount;
ORACLE 例程已经启动。

Total System Global Area 6413680640 bytes
Fixed Size                  2293216 bytes
Variable Size            1275068960 bytes
Database Buffers         5117050880 bytes
Redo Buffers               19267584 bytes
数据库装载完毕。
SQL> set num 16
SQL> select checkpoint_change# from v$database;

CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
------------------
      141743339676

SQL> alter database open;

数据库已更改。

SQL> select checkpoint_change# from v$database;

CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
------------------
      151743339602

数据库启动过程中scn会被改变,在mount的时候未发生改变
Patch_SCN下载:Patch_SCN下载
Patch_SCN使用说明:Patch_SCN使用说明
OraRecovery下载:OraRecovery下载
OraRecovery使用说明:OraRecovery使用说明

.mkp和.Elbie勒索加密数据库可恢复

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:.mkp和.Elbie勒索加密数据库可恢复

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

最近有朋友咨询了两种win机器文件加密的oracle数据库,通过判断均可修复然后正常open库
.DBF.[5D00A5FE].[Xats@privatemail.com].mkp,可以实现数据文件数据0丢失,和强制拉库效果一样
20221006090624
.DBF.id[10D73871-3400].[hero77@cock.li].Elbie,每个文件丢失数据小于1M
20221006090802
以上两种勒索加密都可以通过Oracle数据文件勒索加密恢复工具,快速open
20221006091325
对于类似这种被加密的勒索的数据文件(.[Xats@privatemail.com].mkp和.[hero77@cock.li].Elbie),我们可以实现比较好的恢复效果,如果此类的数据库(oracle,mysql,sql server)等被加密,需要专业恢复技术支持,请联系我们:
电话/微信:17813235971    Q Q:107644445QQ咨询惜分飞    E-Mail:dba@xifenfei.com
系统安全防护措施建议:
1.多台机器,不要使用相同的账号和口令
2.登录口令要有足够的长度和复杂性,并定期更换登录口令
3.重要资料的共享文件夹应设置访问权限控制,并进行定期备份
4.定期检测系统和软件中的安全漏洞,及时打上补丁。
5.定期到服务器检查是否存在异常。
6.安装安全防护软件,并确保其正常运行。
7.从正规渠道下载安装软件。
8.对不熟悉的软件,如果已经被杀毒软件拦截查杀,不要添加信任继续运行。
9.保存良好的备份习惯,尽量做到每日备份,异地备份。

存储强制拉lun导致数据库异常恢复

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:存储强制拉lun导致数据库异常恢复

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

客户那边反馈有几个lun异常,无法正常online
20221004165647


通过存储工程师强制拉起来lun(清除掉了cache),但是数据库无法正常mount

Fri Sep 30 17:22:57 BEIST 2022
ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
Fri Sep 30 17:22:57 BEIST 2022
This instance was first to mount
Fri Sep 30 17:22:58 BEIST 2022
Starting background process ASMB
ASMB started with pid=25, OS id=12976304
Starting background process RBAL
RBAL started with pid=26, OS id=12779520
Fri Sep 30 17:23:02 BEIST 2022
SUCCESS: diskgroup DATA was mounted
Fri Sep 30 17:23:06 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/udump/xifenfei2_ora_14549110.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kccpb_sanity_check_2], [423012], [422765], [0x000000000], [], [], [], []
Fri Sep 30 17:23:07 BEIST 2022
ORA-600 signalled during: ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT...
Fri Sep 30 17:23:07 BEIST 2022
Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20220930172307]
Fri Sep 30 17:23:09 BEIST 2022
Shutting down instance (abort)
License high water mark = 1
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 9175148

可以要求保护第一现场,把asm中的数据恢复到文件系统中,然后进行恢复,由于客户是10g的环境,无法直接使用asmcmd中的cp实现此项操作,数据库也没有mount成功(无法使用rman的copy),考虑使用oracle的amdu实现此项操作需求.在拷贝过程中报AMDU-00204报错

root@xifenfei2:/recover/amduo#./amdu -diskstring '/dev/rhdiskpower*' -extract data.298 -noreport
amdu_2022_10_01_14_25_31/
AMDU-00204: file not found; arguments: [3] [DATA]
LEM-00031: Error encountered in lempgmh after calling lmserr.

通过dbv校验拷贝出来的数据文件

racle@xifenfei2:/recover#dbv file=/recover/amduo/amdu_2022_10_01_14_25_31/DATA_298.f

DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production on Sat Oct 1 14:36:50 2022

Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = /recover/amduo/amdu_2022_10_01_14_33_26/DATA_298.f


DBVERIFY - Verification complete

Total Pages Examined         : 262144
Total Pages Processed (Data) : 0
Total Pages Failing   (Data) : 0
Total Pages Processed (Index): 0
Total Pages Failing   (Index): 0
Total Pages Processed (Other): 262143
Total Pages Processed (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Failing   (Seg)  : 0
Total Pages Empty            : 1
Total Pages Marked Corrupt   : 0
Total Pages Influx           : 0
Highest block SCN            : 121293100 (0.121293100)

确认此报错(AMDU-00204 LEM-00031)对于拷贝出来的数据文件无直接影响,可以忽略,拷贝出来所有文件进行重建ctl,报ORA-01159错误

SQL> CREATE CONTROLFILE REUSE DATABASE "xifenfei" NORESETLOGS  NOARCHIVELOG  
  2      MAXLOGFILES 50  
    MAXLOGMEMBERS 5  
    MAXDATAFILES 100  
    MAXINSTANCES 8  
    MAXLOGHISTORY 226  
LOGFILE  
group 5 '/recover/df/DATA_262.f'  size 200M ,
group 2 '/recover/df/DATA_266.f'  size 200M ,
group 1 '/recover/df/DATA_267.f'  size 200M ,
group 3 '/recover/df/DATA_281.f'  size 200M ,
group 4 '/recover/df/DATA_282.f'  size 200M ,
group 6 '/recover/df/DATA_283.f'  size 200M
DATAFILE  
'/recover/df/DATA_295.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_298.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_272.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_273.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_296.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_274.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_276.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_277.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_275.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_279.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_278.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_288.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_269.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_300.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_264.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_287.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_280.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_286.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_268.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_285.f',
'/recover/df/DATA_297.f'
CHARACTER SET UTF8  
;  
 37  CREATE CONTROLFILE REUSE DATABASE "xifenfei" NORESETLOGS  NOARCHIVELOG
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01503: CREATE CONTROLFILE failed
ORA-01159: file is not from same database as previous files - wrong database id
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/recover/df/DATA_288.f'

由于部分文件不是该库的,通过进一步分析,除掉不是该库的文件,重建ctl文件成功.尝试recover数据库,报大量ORA-07445错误,由于cache丢失redo损坏导致,此类操作可能导致数据文件损坏【恢复需要谨慎,最好对数据文件做一次备份】

Sat Oct 01 16:23:16 BEIST 2022
ALTER DATABASE RECOVER  database  
Media Recovery Start
 parallel recovery started with 15 processes
Sat Oct 01 16:23:16 BEIST 2022
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 5 Seq 2202 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0: /recover/df/DATA_262.f
Sat Oct 01 16:23:16 BEIST 2022
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 2 Group 6 Seq 2394 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0: /recover/df/DATA_283.f
Sat Oct 01 16:23:28 BEIST 2022
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 2 Group 3 Seq 2395 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0: /recover/df/DATA_281.f
Sat Oct 01 16:23:34 BEIST 2022
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 2203 Reading mem 0
  Mem# 0: /recover/df/DATA_267.f
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p009_13107402.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p014_7929944.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p011_10092678.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_dbw1_12189898.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzdh+0324] [SIGSEGV] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p005_14549014.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbbufaddr2hdr+00d8] [SIGSEGV] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Hex dump of (file 6, block 10) in trace file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_dbw0_13565988.trc
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x0180000a (file 6, block 10)
Bad header found during buffer corrupt after write
Data in bad block:
 type: 2 format: 1 rdba: 0x00000180
 last change scn: 0xa0c3.000a6eeb seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00
 spare1: 0x2 spare2: 0xa2 spare3: 0x3486
 consistency value in tail: 0x0000a0c3
 check value in block header: 0x204
 block checksum disabled
Reread of rdba: 0x0180000a (file 6, block 10) found different data
Sat Oct 01 16:23:35 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_dbw0_13565988.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbbiop+01b8] [SIGSEGV] [Invalid permissions for mapped object] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:36 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p014_7929944.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:36 BEIST 2022
Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20221001162336]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p011_10092678.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p009_13107402.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzfc+00dc] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_dbw1_12189898.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbzdh+0324] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p005_14549014.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbbufaddr2hdr+00d8] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_dbw0_13565988.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbbiop+01b8] [SIGSEGV] [Invalid permissions for mapped object]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:37 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p005_14549014.trc:
ORA-00607: Internal error occurred while making a change to a data block
ORA-00602: internal programming exception
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbbufaddr2hdr+00d8] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] 
Sat Oct 01 16:23:38 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p010_9502918.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3020], [3], [31913], [2], [2395], [210418], [16], []
ORA-10567: Redo is inconsistent with data block (file# 3, block# 31913)
ORA-10564: tablespace SYSAUX
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/recover/df/DATA_278.f'
ORA-10560: block type 'FIRST LEVEL BITMAP BLOCK'
Sat Oct 01 16:23:39 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p010_9502918.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3020], [3], [31913], [2], [2395], [210418], [16], []
ORA-10567: Redo is inconsistent with data block (file# 3, block# 31913)
ORA-10564: tablespace SYSAUX
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/recover/df/DATA_278.f'
ORA-10560: block type 'FIRST LEVEL BITMAP BLOCK'
Sat Oct 01 16:23:39 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_pmon_14418166.trc:
ORA-00471: DBWR process terminated with error
Sat Oct 01 16:23:39 BEIST 2022
PMON: terminating instance due to error 471
Sat Oct 01 16:23:40 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_p010_9502918.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state+027c] [SIGSEGV] 
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3020], [3], [31913], [2], [2395], [210418], [16], []
ORA-10567: Redo is inconsistent with data block (file# 3, block# 31913)
ORA-10564: tablespace SYSAUX
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/recover/df/DATA_278.f'
ORA-10560: block type 'FIRST LEVEL BITMAP BLOCK'
Sat Oct 01 16:23:46 BEIST 2022
Dump system state for local instance only
System State dumped to trace file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/bdump/xifenfei2_diag_15401212.trc
Sat Oct 01 16:23:46 BEIST 2022
Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20221001162346]
Sat Oct 01 16:23:49 BEIST 2022
Instance terminated by PMON, pid = 14418166

绕过redo,直接强制启动库,报ORA-01092错误

QL> startup mount pfile='/tmp/pfile'
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area      10737418240 bytes
Fixed Size                        2114208 bytes
Variable Size                  1560284512 bytes
Database Buffers               9160359936 bytes
Redo Buffers                     14659584 bytes
Database mounted.
SQL> alter database open resetlogs;
alter database open resetlogs
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01092: ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced

分析alert日志,确认是由于undo异常导致

Additional information: 3
Sat Oct 01 17:25:21 BEIST 2022
Setting recovery target incarnation to 2
Sat Oct 01 17:25:21 BEIST 2022
Assigning activation ID 1094862311 (0x414245e7)
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 1
  Current log# 1 seq# 1 mem# 0: /recover/df/DATA_267.f1
Successful open of redo thread 1
Sat Oct 01 17:25:21 BEIST 2022
MTTR advisory is disabled because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not set
Sat Oct 01 17:25:21 BEIST 2022
SMON: enabling cache recovery
Sat Oct 01 17:25:23 BEIST 2022
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: 4krwuz0ctqxdt, SCN: 0x0000.6ee0bde5):
Sat Oct 01 17:25:23 BEIST 2022
select ctime, mtime, stime from obj$ where obj# = :1
Sat Oct 01 17:25:23 BEIST 2022
Errors in file /home/oracle/admin/xifenfei/udump/xifenfei2_ora_19726450.trc:
ORA-00704: bootstrap process failure
ORA-00704: bootstrap process failure
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 8 with name "_SYSSMU8$" too small
Error 704 happened during db open, shutting down database
USER: terminating instance due to error 704
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 19726450
ORA-1092 signalled during: alter database open resetlogs...

类似此类错误的解决方案,以前写过参考:
在数据库open过程中常遇到ORA-01555汇总
数据库open过程遭遇ORA-1555对应sql语句补充
Oracle Recovery Tools恢复—ORA-00704 ORA-01555故障
使用_allow_resetlogs_corruption导致ORA-00704/ORA-01555故障
解决该问题,数据库启动正常,逻辑导出数据,导入数据完成此次恢复任务,实现绝大部分数据恢复

ORA-00316 ORA-00312故障处理

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:ORA-00316 ORA-00312故障处理

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

数据库启动报ORA-00316,ORA-00312,无法正常启动
ORA-00316


通过Oracle数据库异常恢复检查脚本(Oracle Database Recovery Check)分析,确认是当前redo损坏
20221003154221

对于这种情况,只能是屏蔽一致性,强制拉库,结果在拉库过程中报ORA-600 2662错误
ORA-600 2662

这个错误相对比较简单,修改下相关scn即可,数据库open成功

SQL> startup nomount pfile='/tmp/pfile'
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 3.8482E+10 bytes
Fixed Size                  2261368 bytes
Variable Size            8187285128 bytes
Database Buffers         3.0199E+10 bytes
Redo Buffers               93593600 bytes
SQL> CREATE CONTROLFILE REUSE DATABASE "xifenfei" NORESETLOGS  NOARCHIVELOG
  2          MAXLOGFILES 50
  3         MAXLOGMEMBERS 5
  4         MAXDATAFILES 1000
  5         MAXINSTANCES 8
  6         MAXLOGHISTORY 2920
  7  LOGFILE
  8         group 1   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo01.log' size 500M,
  9         group 2   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo02.log' size 500M,
 10         group 6   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo06.log' size 500M,
 11         group 4   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo04.log' size 500M,
 12         group 5   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo05.log' size 500M,
 13         group 3   '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/redo03.log' size 500M
 14  DATAFILE
 15          '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/system01.dbf',
 16          '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/sysaux01.dbf',
 17          '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/undotbs01.dbf',
 18          '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/users01.dbf',
………………
 49          '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/XIFENFEI.dbf'
 50  CHARACTER SET  ZHS16GBK ;

Control file created.

SQL> recover database;
ORA-10877: error signaled in parallel recovery slave


SQL> recover database until cancel;
ORA-00279: change 2290050101 generated at 09/30/2022 23:18:22 needed for thread
1
ORA-00289: suggestion : /u02/oracle/arch/1_2_1116803861.dbf
ORA-00280: change 2290050101 for thread 1 is in sequence #2


Specify log: {<RET>=suggested | filename | AUTO | CANCEL}
cancel
ORA-01547: warning: RECOVER succeeded but OPEN RESETLOGS would get error below
ORA-01194: file 1 needs more recovery to be consistent
ORA-01110: data file 1: '/u01/oracle/app/oradata/xifenfei/system01.dbf'


ORA-01112: media recovery not started


SQL> alter database open resetlogs;

Database altered.

检查数据库字典一致性

SQL> @1
HCheck Version 07MAY18 on 01-OCT-2022 01:07:48
----------------------------------------------
Catalog Version 11.2.0.4.0 (1102000400)
db_name: XIFENFEI

                                   Catalog       Fixed
Procedure Name                     Version    Vs Release    Timestamp
Result
------------------------------ ... ---------- -- ---------- --------------
------
.- LobNotInObj                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- MissingOIDOnObjCol          ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- SourceNotInObj              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- OversizedFiles              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- PoorDefaultStorage          ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- PoorStorage                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- TabPartCountMismatch        ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- OrphanedTabComPart          ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- MissingSum$                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- MissingDir$                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- DuplicateDataobj            ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:48 PASS
.- ObjSynMissing               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- ObjSeqMissing               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedUndo                ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedIndex               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedIndexPartition      ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedIndexSubPartition   ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedTable               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedTablePartition      ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedTableSubPartition   ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- MissingPartCol              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedSeg$                ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- OrphanedIndPartObj#         ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- DuplicateBlockUse           ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- FetUet                      ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- Uet0Check                   ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- SeglessUET                  ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadInd$                     ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadTab$                     ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadIcolDepCnt               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- ObjIndDobj                  ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- TrgAfterUpgrade             ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- ObjType0                    ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadOwner                    ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- StmtAuditOnCommit           ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadPublicObjects            ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadSegFreelist              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- BadDepends                  ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:49 PASS
.- CheckDual                   ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- ObjectNames                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- BadCboHiLo                  ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- ChkIotTs                    ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- NoSegmentIndex              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- BadNextObject               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- DroppedROTS                 ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- FilBlkZero                  ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- DbmsSchemaCopy              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- OrphanedObjError            ... 1102000400 >  1102000000 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- ObjNotLob                   ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- MaxControlfSeq              ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- SegNotInDeferredStg         ... 1102000400 >  1102000000 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- SystemNotRfile1             ... 1102000400 >   902000000 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- DictOwnNonDefaultSYSTEM     ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- OrphanTrigger               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
.- ObjNotTrigger               ... 1102000400 <=  *All Rel* 10/01 01:07:50 PASS
---------------------------------------
01-OCT-2022 01:07:50  Elapsed: 2 secs
---------------------------------------
Found 0 potential problem(s) and 0 warning(s)

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Statement processed.

数据库字典本身没有大问题,但是为了排除潜在风险,建议逻辑迁移到新库