注意:PostgreSQL库出现readme_to_recover勒索

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:注意:PostgreSQL库出现readme_to_recover勒索

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

以前恢复过不少mysql库被删除的勒索case,比如:
read_me_recover_tn勒索恢复
A_H_README_TO_RECOVER勒索恢复
A____Z____RECOVER____DATA勒索恢复
今天在PostgreSQL库中也简单了类似的勒索案例

[postgres@xifenfei database]$ psql 
psql (12.8)
Type "help" for help.

postgres=> \l
                                     List of databases
       Name        |  Owner   | Encoding |  Collate   |   Ctype    |   Access privileges   
-------------------+----------+----------+------------+------------+-----------------------
 ldar-test         | postgres | UTF8     | en_US.utf8 | en_US.utf8 | 
 postgres          | postgres | UTF8     | en_US.utf8 | en_US.utf8 | 
 readme_to_recover | postgres | UTF8     | en_US.utf8 | en_US.utf8 | 
 template0         | postgres | UTF8     | en_US.utf8 | en_US.utf8 | =c/postgres          +
                   |          |          |            |            | postgres=CTc/postgres
 template1         | postgres | UTF8     | en_US.utf8 | en_US.utf8 | =c/postgres          +
                   |          |          |            |            | postgres=CTc/postgres
(5 rows)

postgres=> \c readme_to_recover
You are now connected to database "readme_to_recover" as user "postgres".
readme_to_recover=> \d
         List of relations
 Schema |  Name  | Type  |  Owner   
--------+--------+-------+----------
 public | readme | table | postgres
(1 row)

readme_to_recover=> select * from readme;
                                                                                                   
                                 text_field                                              
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
 All your data is backed up. You must pay 0.0051 BTC to bc1q9p333xxxxxxxxxxxxxj2z5fs27pu3u In 48 hours, 
  your data will be publicly disclosed and deleted . (more information: go to http://2info.win/psg)
 After paying send mail to us: rambler+3d2l7@onionmail.org and we will provide a link for 
   you to download your data. Your DBCODE is: xxxxx
(2 rows)

readme_to_recover=> select oid,relname from pg_class;
   oid   |                    relname                    
---------+-----------------------------------------------
 2196735 | readme
    2619 | pg_statistic
    1247 | pg_type
    4159 | pg_toast_2600
    4160 | pg_toast_2600_index
    2830 | pg_toast_2604
    2831 | pg_toast_2604_index
    4161 | pg_toast_3456
    4162 | pg_toast_3456_index
    2832 | pg_toast_2606
    2833 | pg_toast_2606_index
………………
   13373 | _pg_foreign_tables
   13377 | foreign_table_options
   13383 | _pg_user_mappings
   13391 | user_mappings
   13387 | user_mapping_options
(396 rows)

根据这里的readme的oid值,初步怀疑是drop所有业务表,然后创建了readme表,并且插入了勒索信息.

我做的各种数据库恢复比较多,说实话一直对pg这个特点非常不满意:
1. pg的数据存储本身依赖文件系统,通过oid(来表示库,表示表以及其他各种对象,和很多商业化数据库不一样,对于文件系统过于依赖,这样的情况如果发生了drop/truncate表等操作,表从文件系统中被删除,恢复难度较大
2. pg的表对应本身没有在每个数据块的block记录表的id信息,这样使得无法很好的进行底层基于block的扫描恢复数据,目前我知道的pdu一定的这样的功能,但是那是依赖列匹配,原则上来说对于一个稍微复杂一点的系统,这个恢复思路基本上不可行(因为列相似的数据表可能很多,导致恢复的数据过于混乱)

基于上述的两个特点,如果整个业务库被这种勒索破坏,如果没有备份,想比较好的恢复效果基本上很难(除非你运气非常好,os层面反删除恢复效果特别好,这要取决被删除的表在os上没有覆盖,文件系统元数据没有回收,系统没有识别是ssd环境等因素决定)

基于这种故障在没有备份的情况下很难恢复,那我们要做的就是:
1)有有效的备份或者容灾不被破坏;
     1> 数据需要有效的备份,有条件的建议异机或者离线
     2> 如果有条件可以部署延迟同步的备库,避免发生故障备库同步 被破坏

2)尽可能不让这种故障发生:
     1>数据库不要暴露在公网上,减少被攻击和入侵的风险
     2>数据库不要使用弱口令,减少被暴力攻破密码的风险
     3>注意应用漏洞,减少通过sql注入进行数据库进行破坏
     4>注意已知的数据库安全漏洞,防止被利用进行攻击
     5>注意操作系统安全,因为登录了数据库服务器对于数据库来说就没有安全可言

Oracle 19c 202601补丁(RUs+OJVM)-19.30

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:Oracle 19c 202601补丁(RUs+OJVM)-19.30

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

 Description  Database Update  GI Update  Windows Bundle Patch
JAN2026(19.30.0.0.0) 38632161 38629535 38597735
OCT2025(19.29.0.0.0) 38291812 38298204 38111211
 JUL2025 (19.28.0.0.0) 37960098  37957391  37962957
 APR2025 (19.27.0.0.0) 37642901  37641958  37532350
 JAN2025 (19.26.0.0.0) 37260974  37257886  37486199
 OCT2024 (19.25.0.0.0) 36912597  36916690  36878821
 JUL2024 (19.24.0.0.0) 36582781  36582629  36521936
 APR2024 (19.23.0.0.0) 36233263  36233126  36219938
 JAN2024 (19.22.0.0.0) 35943157  35940989  35962832
 OCT2023 (19.21.0.0.0) 35643107  35642822  35681552
 JUL2023 (19.20.0.0.0) 35320081  35319490  35348034
 APR2023 (19.19.0.0.0) 35042068  35037840  35046439
 JAN2023 (19.18.0.0.0) 34765931  34762026  34750795
 Oct2022 (19.17.0.0.0) 34419443  34416665  34468114
 JUL2022 (19.16.0.0.0) 34133642  34130714  34110685
 APR2022 (19.15.0.0.0) 33806152  33803476  33829175
 JAN2022 (19.14.0.0.0) 33515361  33509923  33575656
 OCT2021(19.13.0.0.0) 33192793  33182768  33155330
 JUL2021 (19.12.0.0.0) 32904851  32895426  32832237
 APR2021 (19.11.0.0.0) 32545013  32545008  32409154
 JAN2021 (19.10.0.0.0) 32218454  32226239  32062765
 OCT2020 (19.9.0.0.0) 31771877  31750108  31719903
 JUL2020  (19.8.0.0.0) 31281355  31305339  31247621
 APR2020 (19.7.0.0.0) 30869156  30899722  30901317
 JAN2020 (19.6.0.0.0) 30557433  30501910  30445947
 OCT2019 (19.5.0.0.0) 30125133  30116789  30151705
 JUL2019 (19.4.0.0.0) 29834717  29708769   NA
 APR2019 (19.3.0.0.0) 29517242  29517302   NA
 Description  OJVM Update  OJVM + DB Update  OJVM + GI Update
JAN2025(19.30.0.0.26.01.20) 38523609 38658587 38658588
OCT2025(19.29.0.0.25.10.21) 38194382 38273545 38273558
 JUL2025 (19.28.0.0.250715)  37847857  37952354  37952382
 APR2025 (19.27.0.0.250415)  37499406  37591483  37591516
 JAN2025 (19.26.0.0.250121)  37102264  37262172  37262208
 OCT2024 (19.25.0.0.241015)  36878697  36866623  36866740
 JUL2024 (19.24.0.0.240716)  36414915  36522340  36522439
 APR2024 (19.23.0.0.240416)  36199232  36209492  36209493
 JAN2024 (19.22.0.0.240116)  35926646  36031426  36031453
 OCT2023 (19.21.0.0.231017)  35648110  35742413  35742441
 JUL2023 (19.20.0.0.230718)  35354406  35370174  35370167
 APR2023 (19.19.0.0.230418)  35050341  35058163  35058172
 JAN2023 (19.18.0.0.230117)  34786990  34773489  34773504
 OCT2022 (19.17.0.0.221018)  34411846  34449114  34449117
 JUL2022 (19.16.0.0.220719)  34086870  34160831  34160854
 APR2022 (19.15.0.0.220419)  33808367  33859194  33859214
 JAN2022 (19.14.0.0.220118)  33561310  33567270  33567274
 OCT2021 (19.13.0.0.211019)  33192694  33248420  33248471
 JUL2021 (19.12.0.0.210720)  32876380  32900021  32900083
 APR2021 (19.11.0.0.210420)  32399816  32578972  32578973
 JAN2021 (19.10.0.0.210119)  32067171  32126828  32126842
 OCT2020 (19.9.0.0.201020)  31668882  31720396  31720429
 JUL2020 (19.8.0.0.200714)  31219897  31326362  31326369
 APR2020 (19.7.0.0.200414)  30805684  30783543  30783556
 JAN2020 (19.6.0.0.200114)  30484981  30463595  30463609
 OCT2019 (19.5.0.0.191015)  30128191  30133124  30133178
 JUL2019 (19.4.0.0.190716)  29774421  29699079  29699097
 APR2019 (19.3.0.0.190416)  29548437  29621253  29621299

最新的patch信息整合来自:Primary Note for Database Quarterly Release Updates KB106822

Patch_SCN快速解决ORA-600 2663故障

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:Patch_SCN快速解决ORA-600 2663故障

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

一个维保客户和我说他们测试库删除了日志文件导致库无法启动,让我帮忙看看
客户现场现况
1. 磁盘空间使用100%

[oracle@We1-db_Test ~]$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs        3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           3.9G  880K  3.9G   1% /run
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/vda1        40G   38G   92M 100% /
tmpfs           783M     0  783M   0% /run/user/0

2. 数据库redo被删除了部分,而且是active状态的被删除

[oracle@We1-db_Test ~]$ ls -l /opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo0*
-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 52429312 Jan 15 15:29 /opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo04.log
-rw-r----- 1 oracle oinstall 52429312 Jan 15 16:26 /opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo05.log

SQL> select group#,SEQUENCE#,STATUS FROM V$lOG;

    GROUP#  SEQUENCE# STATUS
---------- ---------- ----------------
         1       8989 CURRENT
         2          0 UNUSED
         5          0 UNUSED
         4          0 UNUSED
         3       8988 ACTIVE

SQL> select member from v$logfile;

MEMBER
-----------------------------------------------------
/opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo03.log
/opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo02.log
/opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo01.log
/opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo04.log
/opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo05.log

基于当前情况,直接open库无望,但是空间不足问题需要先解决,不然恢复过程中创建redo空间不足依旧会报错卡死,所以先清理了监听和alert等日志,系统空闲了3G多空间,可以进行恢复操作

[oracle@We1-db_Test trace]$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs        3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           3.9G  880K  3.9G   1% /run
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/vda1        40G   34G  3.9G  90% /
tmpfs           783M     0  783M   0% /run/user/0

恢复数据库
1. 由于active redo丢失,毫无疑问,直接强制拉库,使用_allow_resetlogs_corruption参数开干

SQL> startup mount pfile='/tmp/pfile';
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 2455228416 bytes
Fixed Size                  2255712 bytes
Variable Size             905970848 bytes
Database Buffers         1526726656 bytes
Redo Buffers               20275200 bytes
Database mounted.
SQL> recover database until cancel;
ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
ORA-01610: recovery using the BACKUP CONTROLFILE option must be done


SQL> recover database using backup controlfile;
ORA-00279: change 311982775 generated at 12/31/2025 17:35:11 needed for thread
1
ORA-00289: suggestion :
/opt/app/oracle/fast_recovery_area/ORCL/archivelog/2026_01_16/o1_mf_1_8988_%u_.a
rc
ORA-00280: change 311982775 for thread 1 is in sequence #8988


Specify log: {<RET>=suggested | filename | AUTO | CANCEL}
cancel
Media recovery cancelled.
SQL> alter database open resetlogs;
alter database open resetlogs
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01092: ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2663], [0], [311982792], [0],
[311982833], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
Process ID: 11917
Session ID: 576 Serial number: 3

alert日志报错

Fri Jan 16 21:25:31 2026
Assigning activation ID 1750515127 (0x6856bdb7)
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 1
  Current log# 1 seq# 1 mem# 0: /opt/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/redo01.log
Successful open of redo thread 1
MTTR advisory is disabled because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not set
Fri Jan 16 21:25:31 2026
SMON: enabling cache recovery
Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/we1db/trace/we1db_ora_11917.trc  (incident=81753):
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2663], [0], [311982792], [0], [311982833], [], []
Incident details in: /opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/we1db/incident/incdir_81753/we1db_ora_11917_i81753.trc
Use ADRCI or Support Workbench to package the incident.
See Note 411.1 at My Oracle Support for error and packaging details.
Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/we1db/trace/we1db_ora_11917.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2663], [0], [311982792], [0], [311982833], [], []
Errors in file /opt/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/orcl/we1db/trace/we1db_ora_11917.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2663], [0], [311982792], [0], [311982833], [], []
Error 600 happened during db open, shutting down database
USER (ospid: 11917): terminating the instance due to error 600
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 11917
ORA-1092 signalled during: alter database open resetlogs...
opiodr aborting process unknown ospid (11917) as a result of ORA-1092
Fri Jan 16 21:25:33 2026
ORA-1092 : opitsk aborting process

不幸数据库遇到ORA-600 2663错误,这个故障在以前的文章中描述过,基本上和ORA-600 2662的处理思路类似,这里直接使用:Patch_SCN for Linux进行恢复
2. 使用Patch_SCN处理数据库SCN

SQL> startup nomount pfile='/tmp/pfile';
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 2455228416 bytes
Fixed Size                  2255712 bytes
Variable Size             905970848 bytes
Database Buffers         1526726656 bytes
Redo Buffers               20275200 bytes
SQL>@rectl

Control file created.

SQL> recover database;
Media recovery complete.

patch_scn


SQL> alter database open;

Database altered.
SQL> SELECT CURRENT_SCN FROM V$DATABASE;

     CURRENT_SCN
----------------
       322002903

到这里完成数据库open操作,后续逻辑导出完成恢复任务

在生产环境错误执行dd命令破坏asm磁盘故障恢复

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:在生产环境错误执行dd命令破坏asm磁盘故障恢复

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

由于ssh登录错误,客户对生产环境进行了误操作把系统的一块磁盘dd到另外两个磁盘上,由于及时发现立马进行了终止操作,但是还是分别破坏了一点数据(一块盘破坏了2G多,另外一块盘破坏了1G多)
dd


通过分析udev的绑定关系确认被破坏的asm disk名称
udev

再通过asm alert日志确认破坏磁盘在asm disk中情况
asmdisk

通过上述信息基本上可以确认,asmdisk13被分别dd到了asmdisk11和asmdisk26中了部分11
26

基于这种情况,由于asm disk被破坏了1-2G多,直接修复然后正常mount磁盘组基本上没有希望,经过分析以及与客户沟通,确认他们改系统是4节点组成的集群,1/2节点上面跑2套库,3/4节点上跑2套库,数据整体放在data_dg磁盘组中,需要恢复的库是第二个顺序创建的1套库(4套库中只需恢复一套即可),由于破坏的数据本身不多,而且需要恢复的数据不是最初写入asm磁盘组,基于这样的情况,需要恢复的数据库机会比较大.

由于现在三个磁盘头信息一致(一个磁盘被dd到另外两个磁盘上),因此第一步先把损坏的两个磁盘头进行简单修复,为了便于amdu(找回ASM中数据文件)等之类数据可以识别到正确的磁盘头信息,然后进行后续的数据文件提取恢复.使用工具对数据文件进行了批量提取,提取数据完成之后,尝试recover和open库
open

虽然数据库正常打开了,不过很不幸,后台还是有一些坏块报错,通过dbv检查发现有文件有一部分坏块,类似dbv报错信息
1_1

通过分析该文件在磁盘组中各个磁盘的分布情况
map

确认该文件确实有部分block分布在被dd磁盘的破坏的范围内这个部分的数据丢失无法挽回,只能是定位到具体对象然后由业务想办法处理.相对以往的各种dd破坏的案例恢复而言,这个应该是效果比较好的一个,而且也是恢复比较容易的一个,没有使用到asm disk 基于asm au/oracle block 扫描的级别,而且system表空间没有任何损坏,数据库甚至直接open成功了,以往的一些dd案例列举:
asm磁盘dd破坏恢复
dd破坏asm磁盘头恢复
asm disk 磁盘部分被清空恢复

obet实现对数据文件坏块检测功能

联系:手机/微信(+86 17813235971) QQ(107644445)QQ咨询惜分飞

标题:obet实现对数据文件坏块检测功能

作者:惜分飞©版权所有[未经本人同意,不得以任何形式转载,否则有进一步追究法律责任的权利.]

通过一段时间的测试和使用,obet修复了不少bug,关于obet的以往功能和特性的文章:
Oracle数据块编辑工具( Oracle Block Editor Tool)-obet
obet(Oracle Block Editor Tool)第二版发布
并且也在客户的生产环境上进行了实战:obet快速修改scn/resetlogs恢复数据库(缺少归档,ORA-00308).利用周末的时间又对obet的工具进行了功能增强,增加了dbv(数据块校验)功能.

Oracle dbv的不足
1. oracle dbv需要在安装oracle服务端的环境下才能执行
2. oracle dbv对于文件大小不正确(文件头记录block数和实际文件大小不匹配),文件头损坏等情况都可能导致dbv无法执行,类似下面的报错

C:\Users\XFF>dbv file=H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\system01.dbf

DBVERIFY: Release 11.2.0.4.0 - Production on 星期日 1月 11 17:30:29 2026

Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.


DBV-00107: 未知标头格式 (0) (2054913149)

C:\Users\XFF>
C:\Users\XFF>dbv file=H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\users01.dbf

DBVERIFY: Release 11.2.0.4.0 - Production on 星期日 1月 11 20:10:05 2026

Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.


DBV-00102: FILE (H:\BAIDUNETDISK\KINGDEE\USERS01.DBF) 在 end read 操作 (-1) 期间出现文件 I/O 错误

C:\Users\XFF>

3. oracle dbv一条命令执行检测一个数据文件,如果数据文件多,检查起来很繁琐
4. oracle dbv么有检查进度,对于io性能较慢,数据文件较大的情况,无法跟踪检查进度.

obet的dbv功能使用
1. 配置listfile.txt文件,格式为file# name

1 H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\system01.dbf
5 H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\EAS_D_EAS_STANDARD.ORA

2. 启动obet,执行open listfile.txt(如果不在obet目录提供完整路径)

OBET> open listfile.txt
Loaded 2 files from config file 'listfile.txt'.

OBET> info

Loaded files (2 total):
----------------------------------------
Number  Path
----------------------------------------
     1  H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\system01.dbf
     5  H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\EAS_D_EAS_STANDARD.ORA
----------------------------------------

3. 执行dbv命令(logfile 部分为可选),默认会记录日志在obet目录下面dbv_年月日时分秒.log的日志

OBET> dbv

===============================================
DBV (Data Block Verification)
Block Size: 8192 bytes
===============================================

Verifying file #1: H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\system01.dbf (131841 blocks) - Started: 2026-01-11 18:03:58
file 1, block 0: checksum error (expected 0xC4DA, got 0xC478), bad block
file 1, block 1: checksum error (expected 0xF835, got 0xB835), bad block
  Progress: 10000 / 131841 blocks checked...
  Progress: 20000 / 131841 blocks checked...
……………….
  Progress: 120000 / 131841 blocks checked...
  Progress: 130000 / 131841 blocks checked...
  File #1 completed: 0 all zero, 0 soft corrupted, 0 tailchk error, 2 checksum error, 0 rdba error
Verifying file #5: H:\BaiduNetdisk\kingdee\EAS_D_EAS_STANDARD.ORA (4194303 blocks) - Started: 2026-01-11 18:04:08
  Progress: 10000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 20000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
……………………
  Progress: 260000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 270000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
file 5, block 277678: tailchk error (expected 0x0228BB21, got 0x0228AD21), bad block
file 5, block 277679: rdba error (expected 277679, got 277615), bad block
file 5, block 277680: rdba error (expected 277680, got 277616), bad block
file 5, block 277681: rdba error (expected 277681, got 277617), bad block
………………
file 5, block 277692: rdba error (expected 277692, got 277628), bad block
file 5, block 277693: rdba error (expected 277693, got 277629), bad block
file 5, block 277694: rdba error (expected 277694, got 277630), bad block
file 5, block 279406: tailchk error (expected 0x02281E22, got 0x00000700), bad block
file 5, block 279407: rdba error (expected 279407, got 448), bad block
file 5, block 279408: rdba error (expected 279408, got 0), bad block
………………
  Progress: 280000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 290000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 300000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 310000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
file 5, block 312932: tailchk error (expected 0x0106C0B8, got 0x010629B8), bad block
file 5, block 312933: rdba error (expected 312933, got 312869), bad block
file 5, block 312934: rdba error (expected 312934, got 312870), bad block
file 5, block 312935: rdba error (expected 312935, got 312871), bad block
file 5, block 312936: rdba error (expected 312936, got 312872), bad block
file 5, block 312937: rdba error (expected 312937, got 312873), bad block
file 5, block 312938: rdba error (expected 312938, got 312874), bad block
file 5, block 312939: rdba error (expected 312939, got 312875), bad block
………………
  Progress: 4180000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  Progress: 4190000 / 4194303 blocks checked...
  File #5 completed: 1 all zero, 0 soft corrupted, 13 tailchk error, 1 checksum error, 255 rdba error

DBV completed at: 2026-01-11 18:09:30

===============================================
DBV Summary:
Total blocks checked: 4325872
Total all zero blocks found: 1
Total all rdba error blocks found: 255
Total all tailchk error blocks found: 13
Total all soft corrupted blocks found: 0
Total all checksum error blocks found: 3
Total bad blocks found: 272
===============================================

Detailed report saved to: dbv_20260111180358.log

OBET>

检测效果截图
obet-dbv