This gallery contains 10 photos.
在windows 4运行oracle 7.3.4是一个难得的搭配,今天有机会一见,共享几张图片和大家分享 windows 4 ORACLE 7.3.4安装过程 ORACLE 7.3.4使用 windows4+oracle 7.3.4截图下载
This gallery contains 10 photos.
在windows 4运行oracle 7.3.4是一个难得的搭配,今天有机会一见,共享几张图片和大家分享 windows 4 ORACLE 7.3.4安装过程 ORACLE 7.3.4使用 windows4+oracle 7.3.4截图下载
在一次测试中,需要模拟在归档模式下,数据库发生多次redo切换而这些redo并未被归档的情景,一般来说这样的情况只有在归档目录满的时候会遇到.但是在日常测试中,这样的归档目录满的模拟不太现实,可以通过oradebug SUSPEND来实现该功能,让arcn进程挂起
配置log_archive_max_processes为1(可以配置多个,但是1个更加方便测试)
SQL> show parameter log_archive_max_processes; NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ log_archive_max_processes integer 1
该配置可以在线修改,但是不重启数据库不一定完全生效(测试环境本来是4,修改为1之后,还有arc0和arc1进程)
查找arcn进程
[oracle@localhost trace]$ ps -ef|grep ora_arc oracle 3686 1 0 21:07 ? 00:00:00 ora_arc0_test
oradebug进程(session 1)
SQL> oradebug setospid 3686 Oracle pid: 57, Unix process pid: 3686, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (ARC0) SQL> oradebug SUSPEND Statement processed.
alert日志
Tue Apr 16 21:09:42 2013 Unix process pid: 3686, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (ARC0) flash frozen [ command #1 ]
切换日志(session 2)
SQL> archive log list;
Database log mode Archive Mode
Automatic archival Enabled
Archive destination USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
Oldest online log sequence 53
Next log sequence to archive 55
Current log sequence 55
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
SQL> /
System altered.
SQL> alter system checkpoint;
System altered.
SQL> set lines 134
SQL> col member for a40
SQL> SELECT thread#,
2 a.sequence#,a.ARCHIVED,
3 a.group#,
4 TO_CHAR (first_change#, '9999999999999999') "SCN",
5 a.status,
6 MEMBER
7 FROM v$log a, v$logfile b
8 WHERE a.group# = B.GROUP#
9 ORDER BY a.sequence# DESC;
THREAD# SEQUENCE# ARC GROUP# SCN STATUS MEMBER
---------- ---------- --- ---------- ----------------- ---------------- ----------------------------
1 57 NO 3 261053 CURRENT /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo03.log
1 56 NO 2 261046 INACTIVE /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo02.log
1 55 NO 1 260856 INACTIVE /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo01.log
SQL> alter system switch logfile;--hang住
此时alert日志
Tue Apr 16 21:10:19 2013 Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 56 (LGWR switch) Current log# 2 seq# 56 mem# 0: /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo02.log Tue Apr 16 21:10:36 2013 Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 57 (LGWR switch) Current log# 3 seq# 57 mem# 0: /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo03.log Tue Apr 16 21:13:13 2013 ORACLE Instance test - Can not allocate log, archival required Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 58 All online logs needed archiving Current log# 3 seq# 57 mem# 0: /data/oracle/oradata/test/redo03.log
oradebug RESUME(session 1)
SQL> oradebug RESUME Statement processed.
alert日志
Tue Apr 16 21:14:23 2013 Unix process pid: 3686, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (ARC0) resumed Archived Log entry 2 added for thread 1 sequence 55 ID 0x7dd4ccb7 dest 1: Archived Log entry 3 added for thread 1 sequence 56 ID 0x7dd4ccb7 dest 1:
hang住会话继续执行(session 2)
SQL> alter system switch logfile; System altered.
一台win oracle 数据库,重启后发现数据库无法访问,检查发现是Bug 4899479,但是oracle未提供完整的解决方法,这里根据自己对于数据库启动过程的理解,通过屏蔽前滚和回滚,拉起来数据库
数据库版本平台信息
ORACLE:11.1.0.7 OS:WIN 2008 R2 X64
数据库启动报错
Tue Apr 16 12:36:31 2013 alter database open Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads parallel recovery started with 7 processes Started redo scan Completed redo scan 28878 redo blocks read, 7353 data blocks need recovery Started redo application at Thread 1: logseq 7960, block 14132 Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 1 Seq 7960 Reading mem 0 Mem# 0: D:\APP\SDWLJG-DB101\ORADATA\WLJG\REDO01.LOG Tue Apr 16 12:36:32 2013 RECOVERY OF THREAD 1 STUCK AT BLOCK 915068 OF FILE 9 Hex dump of (file 9, block 1698691) in trace file c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\trace\wljg_p001_1500.trc Corrupt block relative dba: 0x0259eb83 (file 9, block 1698691) Bad header found during crash/instance recovery Data in bad block: type: 0 format: 0 rdba: 0x0000a206 last change scn: 0x2359.0259eb83 seq: 0xf7 flg: 0x0b spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x601 consistency value in tail: 0x02c10243 check value in block header: 0x0 block checksum disabled Reread of rdba: 0x0259eb83 (file 9, block 1698691) found valid data Slave exiting with ORA-1172 exception Errors in file c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\trace\wljg_p001_1500.trc: ORA-01172: recovery of thread 1 stuck at block 915068 of file 9 ORA-01151: use media recovery to recover block, restore backup if needed Tue Apr 16 12:36:32 2013 Errors in file c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\trace\wljg_p003_4088.trc (incident=187558): ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2037], [12619645], [41474], [6], [1], [247], [12619645], [0], [], [], [], [] Incident details in: c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\incident\incdir_187558\wljg_p003_4088_i187558.trc ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [kcbs_dump_adv_state()+1352] [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [ADDR:0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF] [PC:0x16BFD20] [UNABLE_TO_READ] [] ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2037], [12619645], [41474], [6], [1], [247], [12619645], [0], [], [], [], [] Incident details in: c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\incident\incdir_187559\wljg_p003_4088_i187559.trc Errors in file c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\trace\wljg_p006_1216.trc (incident=187567):
这里提示file 9 block 915068异常,但是通过dbv检查发现file 9无任何坏块.
trace文件内容
Dump continued from file: c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wljg\trace\wljg_p003_4088.trc
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [2037], [12620930], [41474], [2], [1], [247], [12619645], [0], [], [], [], []
** DBGRL Error: ARB Alert Log
** DBGRL Error: <msg time='2013-04-16T11:05:58.522+08:00' org_id='oracle' comp_id='rdbms'
msg_id='dbgexProcessError:1097:3370026720' type='TRACE' level='16'
host_id='SDWLSCJG-DB' host_addr='172.18.1.15'>
<txt>Incident details in: c:\app\sdwljg-db101\diag\rdbms\wljg\wlj
========= Dump for incident 129879 (ORA 600 [2037]) ========
*** 2013-04-16 11:05:58.522
----- SQL Statement (None) -----
Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
-------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------------------
ksedst1()+111 CALL??? skdstdst()+0 000000000 000000000 01CFC9B80
000000200
ksedst()+63 CALL??? ksedst1()+0 000000005 021B00600 005D30C80
000002004
dbkedDefDump()+1012 CALL??? ksedst()+0 000000000 000000000 000000000
000000000
ksedmp()+51 CALL??? dbkedDefDump()+0 000000003 000000002 021AF92C0
000405038
__PGOSF184_ksfdmp() CALL??? ksedmp()+0 000000000 000000000 000000000
+27 27F00000000
dbgexPhaseII()+266 CALL??? __PGOSF184_ksfdmp() 00000000D 0082FAE50 000000000
+0 000000004
dbgexProcessError() CALL??? dbgexPhaseII()+0 021B00600 021AFCA50 000000201
+1313 000000000
dbgeExecuteForError CALL??? dbgexProcessError() 021B00600 021B07590 000000001
()+55 +0 000000000
dbgePostErrorKGE()+ CALL??? dbgeExecuteForError 021AFCA30 021AFCA80 00000002E
1608 ()+0 000000005
dbkePostKGE_kgsf()+ CALL??? dbgePostErrorKGE()+ 01CFC99D0 021B0E080 000000258
65 0 021B0E080
kgeade()+556 CALL??? dbkePostKGE_kgsf()+ 000002000 000000000 000000009
0 000000004
kgeriv_int()+105 CALL??? kgeade()+0 3A4F00000003 000C09482
0FFFFFFFF 000000000
kgeriv()+27 CALL??? kgeriv_int()+0 3A9A024E0 000000000 01CFC9410
000000000
kgesiv()+102 CALL??? kgeriv()+0 0000008D5 0000008C3 021AFD9A0
000AFDC73
ksesic7()+125 CALL??? kgesiv()+0 006371F20 000000007 27F912000
200000004
kcoexam()+248 CALL??? ksesic7()+0 2000007F5 000000000 000C09482
000000000
kcbtema()+2154 CALL??? kcoexam()+0 27FFC22C8 39E113470 3A940BBB8
000000000
kcrpap()+355 CALL??? kcbtema()+0 27FFC22C8 28BFC2628 000000000
021B10200
kcrpdv()+1655 CALL??? kcrpap()+0 021B101A0 000000002 000000004
000000512
kxfprdp()+1384 CALL??? kcrpdv()+0 3A7AD3098 000000000 00000000C
00757CF00
opirip()+1396 CALL??? kxfprdp()+0 00000001E 005CDB518 021AFF9E0
000000000
opidrv()+855 CALL??? opirip()+0 000000032 000000004 021AFFD30
000000000
sou2o()+52 CALL??? opidrv()+213 000000032 000000004 021AFFD30
021AFFDB0
opimai_real()+295 CALL??? sou2o()+0 000000000 7FEFD9819B5
000000000 000000000
opimai()+96 CALL??? opimai_real()+0 000000000 000000000 000000000
000000000
BackgroundThreadSta CALL??? opimai()+0 021AFFE98 000000001 000000000
rt()+695 000000000
00000000775AF56D CALL??? BackgroundThreadSta 00A26B7A0 000000000 000000000
rt()+0 000000000
0000000077923281 CALL??? 00000000775AF560 000000000 000000000 000000000
000000000
--------------------- Binary Stack Dump ---------------------
查询mos发现During Startup (Open Database) Alert Log Shows ORA-600[2037] and ORA-7445[kcbs_dump_adv_state] [ID 551993.1]和我们这里展示的错误相符,引起该问题的原因主要是因为:The database may crash and fail to open due to undo/redo corruption if you are using distributed transactions.因为使用分布式事务的时候,数据库crash导致undo/redo corruption,从而使得数据库无法正常启动.
故障处理思路
因为通过数据库alert日志可以知道,数据库是在做前滚的时候并发进程失败,设置fast_start_parallel_rollback=false,禁止数据库实例恢复并发,可以恢复依然失败.因为前滚过不去,那就通过设置隐含参数禁止数据库前滚,在open数据库的过程中发现ora-600[2662]错误,推进scn,继续open数据库发现ora-600[4194],通过设置undo管理模式,屏蔽事务,屏蔽回滚段等方法,终于重新open库并重建undo,然后重建库算是完成恢复任务
从oracle 12c开始,oracle 也提供了类似sql server的top,mysql的limit分页功能,在本文中分别通过TOP N和传统方法来实现分页,sql实现效果是(按照id 倒序排列,取第六条到底十条)
TOP N写法

SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER CON_ID
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.0.2 - 64bit 0
PL/SQL Release 12.1.0.0.2 0
CORE 12.1.0.0.2 0
TNS for Linux: Version 12.1.0.0.2 0
NLSRTL Version 12.1.0.0.2 0
SQL> set autot on exp stat
SQL> SELECT id
2 FROM t_xifenfei
3 ORDER BY id desc offset 5 rows FETCH next 5 ROWS ONLY;
ID
----------
188
187
186
185
184
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 755690401
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 192 | 7488 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 192 | 7488 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK| | 192 | 768 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_XIFENFEI | 192 | 768 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("from$_subquery$_003"."rowlimit_$$_rownumber"<=CASE WHEN (5>=0)
THEN 5 ELSE 0 END +5 AND "from$_subquery$_003"."rowlimit_$$_rownumber">5)
2 - filter(ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( ORDER BY INTERNAL_FUNCTION("ID") DESC
)<=CASE WHEN (5>=0) THEN 5 ELSE 0 END +5)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
7 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
619 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
544 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
5 rows processed
传统分页写法
SQL> select id from (select id,rownum rn from (
2 select id from t_xifenfei order by id desc
3 )) where rn<11 and rn>=6;
ID
----------
188
187
186
185
184
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 327151993
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 192 | 4992 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 192 | 4992 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | COUNT | | | | | |
| 3 | VIEW | | 192 | 2496 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | SORT ORDER BY | | 192 | 768 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_XIFENFEI | 192 | 768 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("RN">=6 AND "RN"<11)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
7 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
619 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
544 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
5 rows processed
从这里可以看出来两种sql分页写法,在小数据量上效率都差不多,但是明显TOP N的写法更加简单,更加灵活.如果数据量大可能还是需要自己写分页SQL。TOP N是通过ROW_NUMBER() OVER INTERNAL_FUNCTION(“ID”)和CASE WHEN内部转换实现分页功能.
官方文档创建表语句部分说明
在12c中,表支持默认列为sequence值,而且不用使用传统的触发器来实现该功能.



12c创建表使用默认sequence测试过程
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER CON_ID
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition Release 12.1.0.0.2 - 64bit 0
PL/SQL Release 12.1.0.0.2 0
CORE 12.1.0.0.2 0
TNS for Linux: Version 12.1.0.0.2 0
NLSRTL Version 12.1.0.0.2 0
SQL> create table t_xifenfei
2 (
3 id number GENERATED ALWAYS as identity (
4 start with 1
5 increment by 1
6 ),
7 name varchar2(200)
8 );
Table created.
SQL> insert into t_xifenfei(name) values('www.orasos.com');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> col name for a30
SQL> select * from t_xifenfei;
ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------
1 www.orasos.com
SQL> insert into t_xifenfei(name) values('www.orasos.com');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select * from t_xifenfei;
ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------
1 www.orasos.com
2 www.orasos.com
SQL> insert into t_xifenfei values(5,'www.orasos.com');
insert into t_xifenfei values(5,'www.orasos.com')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-32795: cannot insert into a generated always identity column
SQL> insert into t_xifenfei(name) values('www.orasos.com');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select * from t_xifenfei;
ID NAME
---------- ------------------------------
1 www.orasos.com
2 www.orasos.com
3 www.orasos.com
补充说明
1.如果设置了列默认值为seq,则不能手工插入一个该列值否则报ORA-32795
2.通过10046跟踪该insert语句未发现trigger对应sql语句操作,比传统自己编写触发器效率原则上更加高
![]() |
|